It’s Not NEW and it’s NOT just the DHS…

Check out some of the OTHER organizations that have purchased these Paper Targets.

• Dept of Defense $3.12 Million worth. Hey, Don’t they fight Wars with other Countries?
• Dept of Homeland Security $1.9 Million worth
• followed by Dept of State… isn’t that supposed to be for ‘Foreign Relations’?
• Dept of Energy…?  What would THEY be doing with guns and needing Training to shoot American Citizens? (Obama admitted Energy Prices are going up MORE)
• Veterans Affairs…? Really? Are they training to keep the Veterans like me out of the fight? What ‘Fight’ are they expecting to have to keep them out of?

“But wait… there’s MORE”

• TSA  almost $1 Million worth. But wait, I thought those guys were just Airport Screeners, Right?
• Border Patrol $444,000 worth. Huh? Aren’t they just watching the Borders to keep people from entering Illegally? what would they be doing Policing the United States?
• Army, Navy and the Air Force… a combined $3 Million worth.  Training to Shoot with “No More Hesitation” Middle Class, Ordinary American Citizens… Mothers, Children, Senior Citizens defending their own Homes, Families and Property.

You see…

• gone are the Targets with Gang Criminals, Robbers, and Murderers…
• gone are the Training Backgrounds of the Urban Inner City where the Vast majority of All Crime and Gun Deaths occur.
• Gun Violence isn’t Really about Race, but do you notice ALL these people are White and living in Rural or Suburban settings and Protecting Homes and Family Members?

They no longer care about that. They have an Agenda to Push

“Facts are stubborned things”- John Adams

The fact that these Cities, like Andrew Cuomo’s NYC, Rham Immanuel’s Chicago and President Obama’s Washington DC, already have the most Restrictive Gun Laws or outright Gun Bans in the United States yet with out of control Gun Violence just doesn’t fit into their Propaganda or Agenda.

They want YOU Disarmed and Unable to defend yourself against Intruders, Criminals, Theives, Murderers, Rapists, and THUGS… and Oh yeah, I forgot… THEM… when they start tightening up the Control Screws even tighter.

WE are the Enemy they are Preparing to Engage…

Wow, the Jig is Really Up, isn’t it?

Learn more:  http://www.naturalnews.com/039177_gun_range_targets_pregnant_women_Homeland_Security.html#ixzz2LY7K7QHk

Don’t they know that this is Cool and Hip? Who cares if they actually LIVE in Harlem and KNOW about their own Culture and History… Hollywood and POP CULTURE will tell them what They and US should be doing, Right?

What in the World could be Behind This Garbage?

• I mean, are people REALLY this starved for attention that they have to make some Ridiculous Video that doesn’t even represent what they say it represents?
• As ‘Consumers of Entertainment’, are people REALLY this ‘hard up’ to be 6yrs old again and shut down their Reasoning and Cognitive functions to let just Any Old Post-Alimentary Bovine Excrement thing into their minds?
• Is this a Reverse of Orwell’s “Two Minutes of Hate”?

Or For a bit of Conspiracy Thrown in…

Or… it could be another attempt by the Powers That Be (PTB) at Fomenting Racial Discrimination and Divisions?

Why would ALL these people actually FROM Harlem actually say that “Harlem Shake” is no more Harlem than Federal Reserve is “Federal” Government”?

(oops, sorry for the Politics… if you didn’t know, The Federal Reserve actually IS a Private Central Bank, no more “Federal” than Federal Express is the US Postal System)

And what about the ONLY Words in the so-called Harlem Shake Videos?

“Con los Terroristas” Translation “We’re with the Terrorists”

Whuu…? Post 9/11 New Yorkers would NEVER say something as Offensive as This.

Why would they, the PTB, want Ordinary American Citizens saying repeatedly “We’re with the Terrorists” while Homeland Security is busy buying up 2 Billion (yup, that’s Billion with a B) rounds of Hollow Point rounds in the last 10 months (Clue: they don’t do ‘target practice’ and ‘Routine Training’ with such expensive Ammunition) and the Military and Police have been flying Unannounced Helicopters and even LIVE Fire Training Exercises (thankfully with Blanks) in Urban areas and Cities around the United States? Might as well start shouting “Come and Shoot Me”. Next you’ll hear…

“Venga y Me Mata” Translation: “Come and Kill Me”

What’s up with that? Could this Mind Numbingly Idiotic Video ‘Meme’, making the rounds on Youtube with over 60 Million Views and Multiple Copycat Videos be a elaborate attempt at Population Phsycological Programming? Or is it just Stupid People educated by a Stupid Public Education system being Stupid?

How Stupid… but by all means, go back to Sleep. Everything’s Fine.

-mike

Enjoy the Day. -mike

Confessions of a one time Calvinist

Posted: February 18, 2013

These are reposted from http://charismaticcentral.com/forums/jokes/12316-calvinist-dictionary.html with some Minor changes.

Thou Shalt laugh uncontrollably, it’s Predestined. It is long, but Persevere with it to the end, I’m sure you will enjoy!!

— Mike

Lately I’ve been A Little Stressed out. Since I’m a Christian who isn’t supposed to be “Anxious about Anything”… I cheat and call them ‘Concerns’.

• Money concerns,
• Employment concerns,
• Political concerns,
• Family Health concerns

These are just a few of the Daily Stresses that we all take on when we wake up in the morning (if we can successfully get to sleep) and Dog Us Out till we once again head toward the Soft Pillow which often turns to a Hard Rock “Ricocheting” all the multitudinous Worries and Anxieties and even Christian ‘Concerns’.

What do you do for Relaxation and Escape from these Feelings of Hopelessness and Dispair? I have my Short List here…

• A Good Cup of Coffee, Tea in the Morning
• … or Cab-Sav in the Evening…
• Doing the Dishes by Hand
• Folding the Laundry (weird, I know)
• Ironing the Shirts and Slacks (Pure Zen)
• Watering the Back Yard Grass
• Reading a Good Book (or THE Good Book, the Bible)

What kinds of Relaxing activities do you use when it gets a bit too much to handle? Let us know and Join the Conversation.

-mike

Tell me again that FEMA Camps and Agenda 21 Forced Relocation couldn’t happen in America? Do you Really trust our President Obama of the “Executive Order” suspending of enforcement of Federal Immigration Laws and “Self-Declared Legality” of Drone Killing of American Citizens who haven’t been Charged, Indicted or Convicted of ANY Crime?

• Does anyone care that our Constitutionally Guaranteed  Rights and Freedoms are being stripped away and swept aside?
• Is American Idol and the latest season of Survivor that Mesmerizing to you?
• Do you really care more about Britney Spears, Kobe Bryant and Kate Upton more than your own Family’s Future?

FDR did this by nothing more than Unconstitutional ‘Executive Order’ and it was enforced NOT by Civilian Authority, but by the War Department… American Citizens were considered “Enemy Combatants” by their OWN Country, having done NOTHING but be the wrong Race and nationality. No Charges, No Indictments, No Due Process and No Convictions in a Court of LAW

FDR did more than just suspend Habeas Corpus, he suspended their Constitutional Rights by Executive Order. Tell me again what a Great President FDR was? Just following in the footsteps of Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson… Now President Obama…

-mike

Japanese Relocation Centers

During World War II, nearly 120,000  Japanese Americans were under lock and key

by Ricco Villanueva Siasoco and Shmuel Ross

Read more:  Japanese Internment in World War II — Infoplease.com http://www.infoplease.com/spot/internment1.html#ixzz2LM7SzY00

Obama’s Secret Court for Killing

by Andrew P. Napolitano

Recently by Andrew P. Napolitano:

Obama Gives Himself Permission To Kill

President Obama willingly admits he dispatched CIA agents to kill an American and his teenage son and the son’s American friend while they were in a desert in Yemen in 2011. He says he did so because the adult had encouraged folks to wage war on the United States and the children were just “collateral damage.” He says further that he’ll do this again when he is convinced that killing Americans will keep America safe. He says he knows the adult encouraged evil, and his encouragement caused the deaths of innocents. The adult was never charged with a crime or indicted by a grand jury; he was just targeted for death by the president himself and executed by a CIA drone.

International law and the law of war, to both of which the U.S. is bound by treaty, as well as federal law and the Judeo-Christian values that underlie the Declaration of Independence (which guarantees the right to live) and the Constitution (which permits governmental interference with that right only after a congressional declaration of war or individual due process) all provide that the certainty of the identity of a human target, the sincerity of the wish for his death, the perception of his guilt and imminent danger are insufficient to justify the government’s use of lethal force against him. The president may only lawfully kill after due process, in self-defense or under a declaration of war.

The reasons for the constitutional requirement of a congressional declaration of war are to provide a check on the president’s lust for war by forcing him to obtain formal congressional approval, to isolate and identify the object of war so the president cannot kill whomever he pleases, to confine the warfare to the places where the object’s military forces are located so the president cannot invade wherever he wishes, and to assure termination of the hostilities when the object of the war surrenders so the president cannot wage war without end.

But when war is waged, only belligerents may be targeted, and advocating violence against the U.S. is not an act of wartime violence and does not make one a belligerent. Were this not so, then nothing would lawfully prevent the U.S. from killing Americans who spoke out in favor of al-Qaida, and then killing Americans who spoke out against war and killing, and then killing Americans whose words became an obstacle to killing.

That’s the reason the enabling federal legislation enacted in support of the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force specifically exempts expressive conduct from the ambit of prohibited criminal or warlike behavior that can provide the basis for any government prosecution or military belligerence. So, the feds can shoot at a guy with a bomb in his hands when he is about to explode it, but not at a guy with a megaphone in his hands when he is about to speak through it.

Thus, if New Mexico-born Anwar al-Awlaki had been shooting at American troops at the time the government took aim at him, naturally, the troops can shoot back. But when he merely encourages others to shoot, his behavior is protected by the natural law, the First Amendment and numerous federal statutes. As well, he was 10,000 miles from the U.S., never known to have engaged in violent acts, and having a private conversation at a roadside cafe in a desert when he was killed. No law or legal principle justifies the U.S. government killing him then and there; in fact, numerous laws prohibit it.

The president’s use of the CIA for offensive killing also violates federal law. Intelligence agents may only lawfully kill in self-defense, not offensively. Only the military may lawfully kill offensively. In the al-Awlaki case, intelligence sources have confirmed to Fox News that a team of American and Yemeni intelligence agents had followed al-Awlaki and had him under continuous observation at the time of his killing and for the preceding 48 hours. They easily could have arrested him – had he been charged with a civilian crime or a war crime, which he wasn’t.

Of course, the murder of his Colorado-born son and the son’s American friend are not even arguably defensible, and the president’s spokesman who suggested that the young al-Awlaki should have “chosen a different father” shows a seriously defective thought process and an utter antipathy for the rule of law in places of power.

We now confront the truly unthinkable: a proposal to establish yet another secret court, this one with the authority to authorize the president and his designees to kill Americans. This proposal has come from Congress, which seems more interested in getting in on the killing than in upholding the Constitution. The federal government only has the lawful powers the states delegated to it. As the states cannot kill Americans without due process, neither can the feds. Congress cannot create this killing court, and no judge on such a Stalinesque court can authorize the president to kill.

The president has made a political calculation that it will be easier for him to justify killing folks he can demonize than it will be to afford them due process, by capturing, housing and trying them. Now, he has come to believe that it will be easier still if unnamed federal judges meeting in secret take the heat. Politically, the president may be correct. But he has taken an oath to uphold the Constitution, and he lacks the moral and legal basis to reject that in favor of killing.

When he kills without due process, he disobeys the laws he has sworn to uphold, no matter who agrees with him. When we talk about killing as if it were golf, we debase ourselves. And when the government kills and we put our heads in the sand, woe to us when there is no place to hide.

February 14, 2013

Andrew P. Napolitano [send him mail], a former judge of the Superior Court of New Jersey, is the senior judicial analyst at Fox News Channel. Judge Napolitano has written seven books on the U.S. Constitution. The most recent is Theodore and Woodrow: How Two American Presidents Destroyed Constitutional Freedom. To find out more about Judge Napolitano and to read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit creators.com.

Copyright © 2013 Andrew P. Napolitano

I bet you didn’t learn this in High School or even in College, but there were actually Two Previous ’13th Amendments’ before the one that Abolished Slavery in the United States after the Civil War for a total of Three, two of which were Passed by Congress and Ratified by the 3/4 of the States at the Time… only One of which still gets published or acknowledged by our ‘Current Form’ of Federal Government (as opposed to the Original Constitutional One).

There was the Original One

which Outlawed Titles of Nobility for those who hold Public Office.

“If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive,
or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall without the
consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension,
office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor,  king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them.”

• Passed by both Houses of Congress overwhelmingly in 1810 (26 to 1 in the Senate and 87 to 3 in the House)
• Ratified by the required 13 of 18 States by 1819 (ratification proceedure interrupted briefly by the War of 1812), either Virginia or Connecticut being the Final State to ratify,
• and then Published by several States and even the Federal Government AS a Valid, Ratified Amendment to the Constitution, the last publication as such was in the Territory of Colorado in 1868.

But somehow, has been Removed sometime after… at least that’s the last time it is seen in Republished State and Federal Materials. Why was it removed around the Lincoln Administration and the Reconstruction after the Civil War? Coincidence?

The Second One

which would have Immortalized Slavery in the United States and forever Forbid the Federal Government and even Future Constitutional Amendments from ‘Interfering’ with Slavery in the States.

“No amendment shall be made to the Constitution which will authorize or give to Congress the power to abolish or interfere, within any State, with the domestic institutions (Slavery) thereof, including that of persons held to labor or service (Slaves) by the laws of said State.”

• Proposed by House Rep. Thomas Corwin of Ohio with an Identical proposal in the Senate by then Sen. William Seward (later Lincoln’s Secretary of State) as a ‘Solution’ to the Slavery Problem in order to Lure the already Seceeded Southern States back into the Union and keep others from joining them,
• Big Suprise, Lincoln also Strongly Supported the Fugitive Slave Act as well, which required All Citizens to help hunt down and return Runaway Slaves to their ‘Owners’.
• Supported in his first Inaugural Address and Actively Advocated in Congress by a newly elected President Lincoln,
• Passed by a Majority of both Houses of Congress, 133 to 65 in the House and 24 to 12 in the Senate,
• but was never Ratified by the States due to the outbreak of the Civil War.

And the One we Know

which Rightly Abolished the Immoral and Inhuman Institution of Slavery in the United States. (makes you wonder why Lincoln ‘really’ invaded the South if it was ‘only’ about Slavery and they could Abolish it Peacefully by Constitutional Amendment?)

“Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation”

• Which was actually Called for and Proposed NOT by Lincoln,
• but by two Republican Representatives in the House, Rep. James Mitchell Ashley (Ohio) and Rep. James F. Wilson (Iowa),
• but proceeded thru Congress with little Support and Advocacy from President Lincoln.
• It was NOT his Idea, Support or Mythical ‘Life’s Goal’ that got it Passed by Congress or Ratified by the States.

It’s just Pure Fiction to believe it was. Just like Spielburg’s Movie. Pure Fiction. Find out the Real History and Legacy of Lincoln, the Civil war and the Reconstruction of the United States.. uh, The South… by Military Conquest. Read “The Real Lincoln” and “Lincoln Unmasked” by Dr. Thomas DiLorenzo.

-mike

Reblogged from Scripture Nuggets: